Local Governance Clinic

Home » General

Category Archives: General


Clinic Exhibition Invitation

In Pursuit of Justice || A Journey through Three Developmental Clinics

Date: April 23, 2016 (Saturday) and April 24, 2016 (Sunday); Time: 11.00am – 6.30pm

Venue: Vismaya Gallery, Rangoli Metro Art Center Boulevard, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Bengaluru – 560 001

The Law and Governance Clinics at Azim Premji University, Bangalore are hosting a 2-day Clinic Exhibition entitled ‘In Pursuit of Justice’

We cordially invite you to attend our exhibition on Saturday, 23rd April, 2016 and Sunday, 24th April 2016 at the Vismaya Gallery, Rangoli – Metro Art Center Boulevard, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Bangalore – feel free to drop in anytime from 11.30 am to 6.30 pm. Do join clinic educators and student members of the clinics to learn more about experiential education and the work that students are undertaking on urgent issues concerning justice and development. Come and experience the journeys of the three clinics through shared learning and reflection.

The exhibition features work carried out between August 2015 and April 2016 by the  Local Governance Clinic, the Land Governance Clinic, and the Human Rights Clinic at Azim Premji University.

We also have a panel discussion ‘Learning through Developmental Clinics’ with clinic educators from Azim Premji University at 4 pm on Saturday, 23rd April 2016.

Details about the Law and Governance Clinics at Azim Premji University can be found online here.

For any enquiries, contact bhavna.jha@apu.edu.in or abhayraj.naik@apu.edu.in

Find our event on Facebook at: http://bit.ly/1U4CyyX

We look forward to seeing you there.

Sign yourself up for the Event on Facebook!



Review of Forest Rights Committees in Andhra Pradesh

Though Forest Rights Act (FRA) was enacted by Indian parliament in 2006 but its genesis is closely linked with almost 60 years of “historical injustice”[1] on various forest dwellers communities (mainly Scheduled Tribes) by state forestry bureaucrats.  We very well know that forested landscape are the main sources of minerals and other natural resources but at the same time they are den of poverty and destitution which leads to conflicted relationship between the state and forest dwellers (on the issue of controlling and managing forests) and eventually resulting in insurgency and Naxalism. At the very basic level FRA provides a legal right to the forest dwellers for the entitlement of forest land and collection of forest produce and grazing, though authors of this paper are skeptical about the prospect of this act by saying that this reform can be a symbolic one than a material one.  The article given, revolves around the constitution of Forest Rights Committees (FRCs) and implementing FRA through FRCs and various intricacies involved in it. The two important question which this paper tries partly to answer are: Does implementation of FRA result in pro-poor institutional reform and will FRA lead to poverty alleviation?

This paper is based on the field study conducted in Andhra Pradesh of five districts (namely Adilabad, East Godawari, West Godawari, Visakhapatnam and Kurnool), further within these districts six panchayats were selected based on how they reflected forest rights deprivation scenarios.

Though FRA has helped a significant number of marginalized people but it’s not a panacea as authors suggested. Why the FRA has not achieved its intended goals is really worth exploring question and for that following points can be taken into considerations-

  • The rights guaranteed under FRA are also subject to state’s eminent- domain[2] in acquisition of lands on the pretext of development projects.
  • Land allotted under FRA is not an absolute titling system (not subject to being taken away from or given away by the possessor) rather in Andhra Pradesh Forest Act there is provision of absolute titling system thus title granted under FRA are not creating ownership over lands.
  • There is no mechanism of promoting gender equality in inheritance under FRA as only customary law is used for succession of property in Scheduled Tribes.
  • FRA has fixed a time limit i.e. 13th December 2005 which means that rights deprived after that time will not be considered.

Andhra Pradesh was one of the first states to implement FRA and it primarily zeroed in on private land rights but common property issues were discarded though this is another matter that ‘welfare language of beneficiaries’ was used than ‘correction of prior injustice’. To implement FRA in A.P. “command & Control” strategy was adopted by the responsible officials which led to minimal window of opportunity for rights redressal. As rules suggest the Gram Sabha meeting should be held at habitation level but this rule was violated and meeting took place at panchayat level, consequently panchayat level meetings could not focus on the specific needs. Apart from these hurdles A.P. forest department added insult to injury by filing writ petition (by arguing that it will lead to degeneration of the forest and the people may misuse the act) in the high court to stay implementation of FRA in the state. A.P. forest department also misinterpreted community rights for forest department local bodies in place of actual village community and hence directed that Van Samrakshana Samiti (VSS)[3] are also eligible for claiming land under FRA. Implementation of FRA at local level by Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA) has following steps:-

  • The initial Gram Sabha meetings and formation of FRCs.
  • FRC awareness raising and training.
  • Distribution of claim forms and receipt of submitted claims.
  • Verification of claims.
  • Final issuing of titles.

There could be many issues/challenges involved in each step of implementation of FRA by ITDA, there is no denial of that as people complained that they did not have prior information of Gram Sabha meeting to be held. In some cases it was found that FRC members were not directly elected by Gram Sabha rather they were nominated by powerful people/officials or the Panchayat members themselves became the member of FRCs. So FRCs were flawed on two grounds:  inclusion and quality. Training of FRC members was not satisfactory. Regarding submission of the claims, most of the claims were individuals and very few were collective due to lack of information about it. Just to quote an example, in Visakhapatnam the forest department has discouraged community claims by saying that no survey of forest land have been done under the AP Forest Act and no final notification for that have been issued to date however villagers rejected this premise by arguing that there is no link between notification of the land and people’s right to file claim under FRA.

Conclusion- FRA was implemented in many parts of India, to my mind, with letter but not with spirit, even though with limited success it provided at least legal right on forest land that translates into livelihood security, consequently dignity and social status. On the other hand legal rights enable these forest dwellers to take help of credit market and MGNREGA. I admit that FRA was launched with the motive of pro-poor institutional reform and several people have benefitted out of it but its entire process was anti-poor. I must say that institutions like Gram Sabha and FRCs have been treated as ‘second class citizen’ while implementing FRA hence genuine cases have not been paid attention to but nonetheless FRA has proved a milestone in correcting historical injustices towards forest dwellers.


[1] Long historical process (since colonialism) of the state extinguishing forest people’s rights and expropriating them has led to  severe livelihood insecurity and poverty on the name of protection and conservation of natural resources and economic growth. Ramchandra Guha calls it “active dispossession of state policies”.

[2] The right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation.

[3] An ad hoc administrative body under the control of forest department, to implement Joint Forest Management (JFM) Schemes.


Written by Sanjay Kumar Jayswal

Our Work Locations

Here are our work locations !!

Local Governance Clinic has visited following villages, locations past few months. Kindly note that Clinic worked on some of the villages, which were not yet reached by google !!

First Visit To Kolar…

Date: Oct 28, 2015

They say that, ‘thousand miles of journey begins just by taking a single first step’. And we took our first step today. Yes, we visited Avantika Foundation’s Field Office at Kolar.  We traveled all through the concrete jungles of Bangalore to the quiet green meadows of Kolar City.  The Foundation’s Field Office is located in the premises of the Zilla Parishad Office, Kolar.

After a brief session of introductions, we got on to understanding ground realities of Mulbagal taluk through the experiences of the Foundation members. We got to know in more detail the work of the foundation in 5 clusters (each cluster has 6 Gram Panchayats) in Mulbagal. Our discussion went on for about two and half hours, and the major part of the discussion was on how do we select the Gram Panchayats for our field work. The Foundation shared some data with us which can help us choose our Gram Panchayat, but more than the data the experiences and inputs from the Foundation’s field associates helped us a lot. The meeting also gave us a more structured understanding of the Standing Committees and the Sub Committees under the Karnataka Panchayati Raj Act.  Again the members shared their experiences with us, that most of these committees exist on paper but are not functional in reality. For us the meeting was really motivational and  inspires us to do something big.

Now we are really exited to launch our clinic work!!!


Written by Vikash Madduri, Sanjay Kumar Jayswal and Sree Harica Devagudi

Hello world!

This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!

%d bloggers like this: